Statewide communications networks are the new new thing in spotlighting civil legal aid. Are you ready to work with Voices to create a JusticeVoices network in your state? At the 2017 NLADA Annual Conference in Washington DC, we will convene the first-ever gathering of state leaders to spotlight emerging models for strategy-setting, staffing and communications plans in several pioneering states.
Four years ago, Voices for Civil Justice was the new thing. Working with our nationwide JusticeVoices network of 1,200 advocates, we’ve generated a drumbeat of media coverage in top-tier national outlets about what civil legal aid is and why it matters.
Now there’s a new new thing: coordinated communications networks at the state level – modeled on the national network that has worked so well for us. Civil justice leaders in several states are recognizing the value of working across program lines to build robust, statewide communications capacity to support funding and advocacy goals.
At Voices, we are eager for every state to have state-level counterparts to our national role and we are promoting and supporting their efforts. So, during the upcoming NLADA Annual Conference in Washington DC, we will convene the first-ever gathering of state leaders to spotlight emerging models for strategy-setting, staffing and communications plans in several pioneering states.
At this gathering, you’ll meet leaders who are coordinating statewide communications in their states and learn how communications infrastructure provides support for their funding and advocacy goals. And you’ll find out how Voices can assist you to create this essential capacity in your state.
This 90-minute session will follow a presentation about Voices’ latest round of opinion research by renowned pollster Celinda Lake at the Civil Caucus (conference plenary on Thursday morning, December 7). The session is scheduled for 2:15-3:45, Thursday, December 7, and will be listed in the conference program as The New New Thing: Strengthening Communications Capacity for Civil Legal Aid in Your State.
Please forward this post to others in your state who will attend the NLADA conference, and please drop a line to Martha (firstname.lastname@example.org) to let us know in advance who from your state will attend the session and whether there are specific state funding or advocacy goals our communications support can help you achieve. We are eager to hear from you!
In this post, we spotlight the contributions of messaging expert Anat Shenker-Osorio who applies tools from cognition and linguistics to examine not just which words work when discussing civil legal aid and access to justice, but also to explain why certain words work when others don't.
Why do some messages fail to persuade while others lure people to your side of an argument?
In recent posts, we highlighted how our new opinion research finds voters overwhelmingly believing that equal justice under the law is a right, not a privilege. We shared guidance on how to talk to the philanthropic community about civil legal aid.
In this post, we spotlight the contributions of messaging expert Anat Shenker-Osorio who applies tools from cognition and linguistics to examine not just which words work, but also to explain why.
In preparation for our latest round of empirical research, we commissioned Anat to conduct a language analysis of how our issues – civil legal aid and civil justice reform – are currently talked about. She examined more than 600 unique expressions in public communications, including legal aid, the courts, the media, the opposition’s arguments, and in popular culture. Her analysis revealed a few competing frames for how we describe the problem we want to solve, and the story we tell about its origins.
Anat’s memo, Prosecuting Our Pitch: An Analysis of Language on Civil Legal Aid, is now posted on the Voices website. Also, you can listen to the audio recording (minute 19:53 – minute 36:00) of Anat presenting to attendees at the Voices’ Communications & Media training on July 19.
Here are three key findings and recommendations:
1) Frame problems as legal
Anat reminds us that frames and metaphors matter – they influence not just how we speak, but the ways we decide, unconsciously, what ought to be done about an issue. Research has shown, for example, that groups primed with a metaphor of “crime as disease” (plaguing our communities, spreading around) came up with preventative solutions such as after school programs and preschool for all. Those who were presented with a metaphor of “crime as opponent” (fight crime, get tough on crime) thought harsher punishments were the way to go.
One of the most consistent findings in each phase of Voices’ opinion research is that Americans have little understanding about the kinds of cases the civil justice system addresses. Research from Rebecca Sandefur suggests that a key barrier to Americans’ getting legal help to solve their civil legal problems is their failure to perceive their problems as legal in nature.
To address this clear challenge, Anat recommends that we bring the courtroom into the frame. Courtrooms have a prominent place on television, but our advocacy for legal aid often shunts them to the background. By using terms like “legal aid lawyer” and phrases like “having your day in court” and “appearing before a judge,” we can activate this familiar frame and help our audience see, for example, that a dispute with a landlord or getting hounded by a bill collector is actually a legal problem with a potential legal solution.
2) Put the actors into our story
When we don’t make clear that people do things, what we suggest instead is that harms are visited upon people, and solutions similarly fall from the sky. Harms result from deliberate bad decisions, if not bad actors, and it takes people to correct them. Anat found that we tend to shield from view the actors who create the harms we catalogue, and we fail to give our audiences the clarity they need to “get” our story about the sources of and solutions to the problems we describe. We are falling prey to the common tendency of implying that bad things just happen by, as she calls it, “passivizing problems.” Her memo enumerates many examples of this that you’ll readily recognize – and can easily fix.
Worse yet, obscuring the origin of problems risks making legal aid itself seem culpable: “Legal aid programs turn away at least one case for every one they take.”
We also tend to leave out of view the people who are subjected to problems as well as those fixing them. For example, better to say: “Politicians who deny funding for civil legal aid force us to turn away half of the eligible people who need our help.”
3) Avoid “Gap” language
There is more harm than good in using the term “justice gap”.
The “gap” metaphor, while popular, fails in every domain where it’s been tested, including health care access, educational achievement, income, and now justice. Anat’s advice to drop gap language is somewhat complicated by our desire to cite and publicize data in an important new LSC report about unmet legal needs, titled The Justice Gap: Measuring the Unmet Civil Legal Needs of Low-income Americans. While we should certainly utilize the contents of the report, we are well advised to minimize and eventually eliminate the use of the “justice gap” metaphor as a way of explaining the problem we’re trying to fix.
The word “gap” says there is a difference, but it offers no origin story about how or why it came to be. Anat strongly cautions that when we offer people no origin story, they will fill one in for themselves, and generally, they default all too readily to blaming individuals rather than systemic problems.
In contrast, using the word “barrier” suggests something that people put up – and that people can, in turn, tear down.
In the upcoming months, Voices will share and train advocates across the country in the new and broader messaging. We are eager to engage with you as we build a message that will catch on in every corner of the country. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns we can be reached at email@example.com.
MORE BLOG POSTS
In preparation for 2017's ABA Days in Washington, DC , the Florida Bar Foundation teamed up with SRLN to develop powerful tools for showing policy makers the impact of LSC funding on the lives of Floridians in every part of the state. In this post, FBF Communications Director Nancy Kinnally explains why she believes the the same sort of analysis that made the ABA Day team’s visuals so powerful could be used to communicate with other key audiences, making media, legal advocacy and philanthropic efforts more effective.
Like you, we’ve been unable to take our eyes off the harrowing images of inundation and suffering along the Texas Gulf Coast. We are working to get a jump on a part of the story we know is too often overlooked – the consequential legal problems that inevitably accompany such a disaster, and the […]
This summer two important new pieces of research yielded fresh guidance on how to communicate about civil legal aid in a way that builds lasting support. This posts focuses on how to communicate effectively with the philanthropic community.
New research finds voters overwhelmingly believe equal justice under law is a right, not a privilegeJuly 31, 2017 - 11:49 am
On July 19, at a national Communications & Media Training, Voices unveiled the results of new messaging research conducted by Celinda Lake and Anat Shenker-Osorio. The findings are good news for advocates looking to increase awareness of and support for civil legal aid.
As civil justice advocates continue to face big challenges across the country, media coverage is more critical than ever to help spotlight the scope of the unmet legal needs of low income Americans and the role of civil legal aid in meeting that need.
Voices is pleased to announce that Washington Post Deputy Editorial Page Editor Ruth Marcus will be in conversation with Janice L. Kaplan at its 2017 Communications & Media Training on Wednesday, July 19.
Are you looking for summer reading recommendations? Here, from your friendly Voices team, are our picks – all with a communications theme of course! In this post, each member of the Voices team shares two books or other resources that during the past year have proven influential, useful, or both.
Last summer Voices convened the first-ever national communications training focused exclusively on civil legal aid. For year two, we've added an advanced media track plus new message research and a half-day of intensive storytelling skills.
Are you A-Team material? Last year, Voices for Civil Justice began a special initiative we call our “A-Team.” Now we are ready to expand it.
Here's where you can find the Voices team at the 2017 Equal Justice Conference in Pittsburgh next week.