News Story (NATIONAL)
Washington Blade (DC)
March 10, 2015
Tags: Civil Rights, LGBTQ, Social Security Benefits
Organizations mentioned/involved: Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Justice in Aging
enefits for unmarried individuals are higher than for married individuals, but even after the Supreme Court ruled against the federal prohibition on same-sex marriage, the Social Security Administration continued to issue benefits to certain individuals in same-sex marriages as if they were single. When the agency caught on, it demanded repayment.
The case, which alleges the Social Security Administration is acting in violation of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, is pending before the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. “Unfortunately for married same-sex couples in marriage recognition states, SSA was completely unprepared to implement policies required of it by law after DOMA was struck down,” said Gerald McIntyre, directing attorney for Justice in Aging.
“The victims of that discrimination should not be the ones to pay for the agency’s mistake.”