News Story
(Indiana)
Representing the couple, Indiana Legal Services contended the contract Carter and Lintner signed was a rental agreement and Rainbow violated the state’s landlord-tenant act by not providing a habitable residence.
Tags: Lawsuit: Federal | Rent-to-own
Rent-to-buy contract argued before Indiana Supreme Court
March 7, 2019 | Marilyn Odendahl | Indiana LawyerRepresenting the couple, Indiana Legal Services contended the contract Carter and Lintner signed was a rental agreement and Rainbow violated the state’s landlord-tenant act by not providing a habitable residence.
Tags: Lawsuit: Federal | Rent-to-own